Quant Sandbox
DerivativesPortfolio & RiskFixed IncomeCorporate FinanceStochastic ModelsGuide
Stochastic Models
Stochastic Learning StudioBeta
1.1Symmetric Random Walk1.2Rescaled Random Walk1.3Standard deviation1.4Central Limit Theorem2.1Defining the Wiener process2.2Increment explorer2.3Joint distributions and covariance3.1Running maximum and minimum3.2Reflection principle3.3First passage times3.4Hitting probabilities
Brownian MotionBeta
Geometric Brownian MotionBeta
Itô ProcessBeta
Monte CarloBeta
Connected Guides
  • Itô's lemma
  • Random walks and Brownian motion

© 2026 Quant Sandbox · A study aid for quantitative finance

Privacy & dataNo cookies

This site does not use cookies and asks for no personal data. It keeps a few small settings in your browser's local storage — your chosen theme and language, the sidebar layout, and your progress and answers in the Guides — so it remembers them on your next visit. This data never leaves your device; clearing your browser storage removes it. Inputs you change can also be captured in the page URL, so you can share or bookmark a specific setup. The site uses Vercel Web Analytics, a privacy-friendly, cookieless service that records only anonymous, aggregated usage (such as page views) without identifying you or tracking you across other sites.

Itô Process

Itô's lemma on the log: for GBM, d ln S = (μ − ½σ²)dt + σ dW. The corrected drift sits below the naive μ.

Parameters

100
10500
0.10
-0.30.4
0.30
0.050.8
1.00
0.255
4
16
Random seed: 7
Metrics
Naive drift (μ)
0.100
Corrected drift (μ − ½σ²)
0.055
Itô correction (−½σ²)
-0.045
ln(S) paths and drift
Corrected driftNaive drift
Itô's lemma step by step
1. Draw the increments dWStep 1 of 3

The path is built from 50 increments. Each ΔW is normal with mean 0 and variance Δt = 0.020; adding them up gives W(t).

W(t)ΔW
W(T)
1.494
Both sides of Itô's lemma

On one Brownian path: the left side is f(W_t) − f(0); the right side is the Itô sum Σ f′(W)ΔW (evaluated at the left point) plus the correction ½Σ f″(W)Δt. Increase n: the corrected sum sticks to the left side, the uncorrected one does not.

f(W_t) − f(0)Σ f′(W)ΔW + ½Σ f″(W)ΔtΣ f′(W)ΔW (no correction)

Drag the time cursor (or focus it and use the arrow keys) to read the values at t.

f(W_t) − f(0), at t = 0.500
0.6120
Σ f′(W)ΔW + ½Σ f″(W)Δt, at t = 0.500
0.5438
Σ f′(W)ΔW (no correction), at t = 0.500
0.0438
f(W_t) − f(0) (T)
0.0558
Σ f′(W)ΔW + ½Σ f″(W)Δt
-0.1325
Error with correction
-0.1883
Σ f′(W)ΔW (no correction)
-1.1325
Error without correction
-1.1883
Mean |error| at T over 200 paths
Error with correctionError without correction

The corrected error falls as n grows; the uncorrected one levels off at the size of the correction.

About this tool

Itô's lemma is the chain rule of stochastic calculus. Applied to the logarithm of geometric Brownian motion, it shows that log prices drift at μ − ½σ², not μ. This visualization makes that −½σ² correction visible and explains where it comes from: the quadratic variation of Brownian motion.

Frequently asked questions

Why does Itô's lemma have an extra term?

Brownian increments are of size √dt, so (dW)² behaves like dt and does not vanish. The second-order Taylor term ½f″σ²dt therefore survives, unlike in ordinary calculus.

What is the −½σ² term in practice?

It is the gap between the arithmetic mean return μ and the growth rate of a typical path. Higher volatility lowers the long-run growth of a single investment even when the mean return is unchanged.