The weighted average cost of capital
The lesson "Net present value and internal rate of return" discounted project cash flows at a rate without saying where that rate comes from. For a project with the same risk as the firm as a whole, the standard answer is the weighted average cost of capital. This lesson builds it from the returns demanded by the firm's two groups of investors.
Debt and equity
A firm raises money from two kinds of investors. Lenders (bondholders, banks) provide debt : they receive fixed interest payments and get their money back first if the firm fails. Shareholders provide equity : they receive whatever is left after the lenders are paid, so their payoff is uncertain. The total value of the firm's financing is
Think of the firm as a pie of cash flows shared between the two groups. The lenders' slice is smaller but safer; the shareholders' slice is larger on average but riskier.
Cost of equity
The cost of equity is the annual return shareholders require for holding the firm's shares. Nobody quotes it directly; it must be estimated from the risk of the shares. The usual tool is the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), introduced in the lesson "CAPM, beta and the security market line":
where is the risk-free rate, the market risk premium, and measures how strongly the share price moves with the market. Example: , a market risk premium of and give .
Cost of debt
The cost of debt is the annual return lenders require, roughly the yield the firm pays on new borrowing. It is lower than , because debt is paid first and its payments are fixed.
Interest has a second advantage: it is deducted from taxable profit. With a corporate tax rate , every unit of interest paid lowers the tax bill by units. Example: a firm with at pays 24 in interest per year; at this saves in tax. This saving is the interest tax shield. The effective cost of debt to the firm is therefore the after-tax cost of debt
In the example, .
The weighted average
The firm as a whole must earn enough on its assets to pay both groups what they require. Weighting each cost by its share of the financing gives the weighted average cost of capital:
The WACC is the return the firm's assets must earn to satisfy both shareholders and lenders after tax. It is the discount rate for projects with the same risk as the firm.
Example: and , with , and .
A project of average risk for this firm should therefore be evaluated with an NPV at .
Market values, not book values
The weights and must use market values: the share price times the number of shares, and the market value of the debt. The balance sheet shows book values, which record what was paid in the past and can be far from what investors would pay today.
Example: suppose the firm above has book equity of only 250, while its shares are worth 600 in the market. With book weights and , the WACC would be about instead of . Discounting at that lower rate would make too many projects look profitable. The returns and are demanded on what the investors' claims are worth today, so the weights must be measured the same way.
When the WACC applies
Discounting at the WACC rests on assumptions that should be stated explicitly:
- The project has the same business risk as the firm's existing assets. A riskier project needs a higher rate, a safer one a lower rate.
- The project is financed with the same mix of debt and equity as the firm, and that mix stays roughly constant.
- The cash flows being discounted are the project's cash flows before any payments to lenders; financing enters only through the rate.
A firm that uses one company-wide WACC for every project tends to accept risky projects that should be rejected and reject safe ones that should be accepted.
Summary
- A firm is financed by debt and equity , with total value .
- The cost of equity is estimated from share risk, typically with the CAPM; the cost of debt is the lenders' required yield.
- Interest is tax-deductible, so debt effectively costs .
- , with market-value weights; it is the discount rate for projects of average risk.
The next lesson, "Capital structure and the Modigliani–Miller theorems", asks whether changing the mix of debt and equity changes the WACC itself.